lawrence520 (lawrence520) wrote,
lawrence520
lawrence520

Drop back ten and punt. . .

http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/08/12/california.same.sex.ruling/index.html?hpt=T1

Ah, well - the California district court judge did more or less what I expected, although I was hoping - he lifted his stay of his judgment that Prop 8 is unconstitutional, but he delayed dissolving the stay until next Wednesday. Which means that unless the Ninth Circuit institutes its own stay, same-sex couples will be allowed to marry in California starting then.

However, I'd be REALLY surprised if a panel of the Ninth Circuit didn't impose its own stay pending appeal. It's possible - the joy of being an Article III judge, with the joy of lifetime tenure, is that unless you're trying to be promoted to the Supremes, you really don't have to give much of a damn about what other people think of your job performance - but I'd still be surprised.

Still, progress - slow, incremental progress, but progress.
Tags: prop 8, same-sex marriage
Subscribe

  • Well, I'm alive. . .

    Which is a good thing. I suffered a massive GI bleed on Tuesday evening due to (they think) diverticulitis. I lost, as one ICU nurse put it,…

  • Blacklist

    Damn, 16 episodes in and Tom FINALLY got interesting. That's an impressive display of restraint in writing and character development. Guess I'm going…

  • Went ammo shopping for my birthday. . .

    as I seem to have developed a 200 round a week shooting habit. I'm still reasonably certain that cocaine addiction would be both more destructive and…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic
    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 0 comments